Sampling Methods and Techniques
Sampling Methods
and Techniques in Auditing
Objectives of Sampling
- Procedures to Meet Objectives: Define the specific
procedures you will use to meet these objectives, such as inspections,
observations, recalculations, or confirmations.
- Review Scope: Decide how many items to review. This
could be all items in a group or a sample of items, depending on the audit
scope and risk assessment.
1. Statistical Sampling:
- Purpose: Used
when quantification is appropriate, and the auditor wants to infer that the
sample's characteristics are indicative of the entire population.
- Benefits:
Provides a measurable level of confidence in the results. It allows auditors to
make inferences about the population with a certain degree of reliability and
precision.
- When to Use:
In high-risk areas or when precise quantification is needed.
2. Non-Statistical Sampling:
- Purpose: Used
in areas of lower risk or where the process is stable and internal controls are
effective.
- Benefits: More
flexible and often less costly than statistical sampling. It is useful when the
population is small, or the cost of statistical sampling is prohibitive.
- When to Use:
In low-risk areas or smaller banks where the process is stable, and controls
are effective.
Determining Sample Size
- Relevant Factors: The sample size depends on factors
such as the risk of material misstatement, the desired level of assurance, the
variability within the population, and the acceptable level of sampling risk.
- Sample Size Guidelines: Published tables and guidelines
can help determine statistical sample sizes based on desired precision and
reliability levels. In non-statistical sampling, the auditor uses judgment to
decide on the appropriate sample size.
Selecting Sample Methodology
- Random Sampling: Ensures each item in the population
has an equal chance of selection, minimizing selection bias.
- Systematic Sampling: Involves selecting items using a
fixed interval from a randomly chosen starting point.
- Judgmental Sampling: The auditor uses professional
judgment to select items based on specific criteria, such as high-value
transactions or items with a higher risk of error.
- Stratified Sampling: Divides the population into
subgroups (strata) and selects samples from each stratum. This method ensures
representation from each subgroup.
Evaluating Results
- Analyze Sample: Apply audit procedures to the selected
sample items and document findings.
- Infer Results: Use the results from the sample to make
inferences about the entire population. In statistical sampling, calculate
confidence intervals and error rates.
- Assess Impact: Determine the impact of any identified
errors on the overall audit objectives and the financial statements.
Documenting Conclusions
- Sampling Objectives: Document the objectives of the
sampling process and how the selected sample helps achieve these objectives.
- Population and Review Characteristics: Define the
population and characteristics reviewed, such as transaction types, account
balances, or controls.
- Sample Size Determination: Explain the rationale behind
the chosen sample size, referencing statistical tables or professional judgment
criteria.
- Methodology Selection: Justify the sampling methodology
used and why it is appropriate for the audit objectives.
- Results Evaluation: Record the findings from the sample
and the conclusions drawn about the population based on these findings.
Assessing Audit-Sampling Processes
Examiners review the auditor’s documentation to ensure
the sampling process is robust and appropriate for the audit objectives. They
will check for:
- Sampling Objectives: Clear documentation of what the
sampling aims to achieve.
- Population Definition: Accurate definition of the
population and review characteristics.
- Sample Size Determination: Logical and justified
determination of sample size.
- Methodology Selection: Appropriate selection and use of
sampling methodology.
By following these guidelines, auditors can effectively
use sampling methods to enhance the reliability and efficiency of their audit
procedures, ensuring a thorough and accurate assessment of financial statements
and internal controls.
Comments
Post a Comment